Geographical location
|
Nature Source ideas are global
|
Middle Eastern roots
|
Far Eastern Asian philosophy
|
Map (simplified)
|
|
Specific Religions
|
Pagan/Native
American
Celtic/Norse/Roman
Mythologies (specifically euro-rooted)
African
Traditions
(mostly polytheistic)
|
Judaism
Christianity
Muslim
(traditionally monotheistic)
|
Hinduism (central asian continent)
Buddhism/ConfucismShintoism/Daoism
(mostly pantheistic)
|
Relationship between human
and divine
|
gulf between humanity
and the gods
|
Divine comes to
humanity
|
Humanity moves toward
divine
|
Source belief objects
|
founders are divine beings manifested in various
form. represented by natural objects (sun, moon, planets);
all the visible wonders
|
founder is the divine being. represented by a
"significant" human to the rest of humanity (a prophet like
Abraham, or Mohammed)
|
founder is an enlightened human. the founder and
subsequent followers are simply fellow travelers pointing
the way to the collective Divine.
|
view of divinity
|
divinity is manifest in
the gods. divinity is a particular being
|
Divinity is a being who
manifests Himself in a particular dominant form
|
divinity is manifest
everywhere and is a cosmic presence of collective
consciences
|
view of humanity
|
humanity is objects at disposal of divine will.
humanity is a separate class of being with irreparable fatal
flaws. people choose their own destiny in their response to
the gods.
|
humanity is clearly distinct from the Divine.
Divinity is responsible for creation and the continuing growth and eternal destity of the human. the purpose of life is to grow to perfection.
|
humanity is a mid-point on the path to the
divine. humanity is a classless being on a sliding scale of
"being-hood." the great life-force is moving all. in a never
ending spiral.
|
view of good and evil
|
there is no evil. what one
views as evil is a misapprehension of the bigger picture.
ie., the natural predator instincts of the wolf/lion are not
"evil" accept perhaps as viewed by the lamb. therefore only
a "victim mentality" would see the universe capable of
evil.
|
good vs evil. what one
views as evil is what has become an aberration of the
original created good. free choice reigns supreme in this
particular view even the inexplicable choices of God to
allow the choices of those who act evilly.
|
good and evil. good and
evil are two necessary halves of a larger whole. thus the
tiger chasing the dragon's tail or the yin folding into the
yang is what makes the universe go 'round. the notion of
undeniable path/destiny is therefore very strong
here.
|
Salvation is
(being safe=)
|
Salvation =
Appeasement
|
Salvation =
Acceptance
|
Salvation =
Attainment
|
role of supernatural
|
supernatural acts are
referred to as magic, or enacted mysteries. most notably
these events are accessible by all believers and are an
assumed part of healthy practice
|
supernatural acts are
referred to as miracles. while there is a small branch of
Christianity that embraces (episcopal/catholic eucharist;
stomata phenomena; pentecostal healings) most are assumed to
be outside the realm of natural practice and demonstrable by
few.
|
supernatural acts are
essentially non-existent. all of life is viewed as a
"miracle unfolding." although a small branch of shintoism
embraces phenomena (shaolin priest). the acceptance of the
transendence is accessible by all believers and are an
assumed part of healthy practice.
|
|
Notes
|
This would also
include religions such as voudoun or what is termed the
"black arts" from Jamaica and
elsewhere (santeria). In fact there are religious links
between Africa and Europe. This has played a significant
role in history, beyond the obvious stories of the Greeks.
The fables about Stonehenge and the Eye of Odin are
historical remnants from this tradition. Also included in
this section would be the neo-Pagan religion. However, there
are a couple of notable distinctions for the Neo-Pagan: 1)
sacrafice is NOT a part of ritual (this is often confused
with the "satanists") rather their primary salvific response
is ALIGNMENT with the order of the universe not APPEASEMENT
to it and 2) the Neo-Pagan religion is quite eclectic in
nature. Drawing inspiration/ritual
from the Native American influence but drawing on the
traditions of the Pagan.
|
This group would also include the
Samaritan believers who only accept the Torah. Derivations
of Christianity (such as Mormonism, Scientology, and
Jehovah's Witnesses) are often grouped here. The
subdivisions are almost wholly based upon different
cannon--religious books held sacred. While the Unitarian group may have its roots
in this group the current expression of Unitarianism is so
broad as to really be outside of it. Unitarianism is
attempting to be truly "Catholic"
(embracing diversity is the root meaning of this word)
in its Christian
diversity and accepting Eastern strains of thought as well
as Neo-Pagan expression. Zorastrianism fits here because it is a monotheistic religion (a syncretic blend of reformed Hindu and middle-era Judaism)
|
Hinduism has branches that more
closely resemble the polytheism of the Mythological
religions. This would also include the source material of Zoroastrianism and
it's derivatives like the Egyptian religion (although Egypt
blended somewhat the mythologies from Africa). Zorastrianism is really a reformation of the native area mythologies that becomes a monotheistic tradition following Judaic influence. Deism would also fit in here--a
rather ambiguous Divine responsible for origins but nothing
else. Also included in this section would be the New-Age
Movement. However, there are a couple
of caveats in this dictinction. The New Age religion is somewhat eclectic in
nature. It draws on the traditions of the East but attempts
to add a "flavor" of Native American mysticism and
appreciation for the earth. It is
perhaps the least concerned about intellectual
cohesiveness.
|
World Religious Views
|
Note: what is not mentioned here is the
fact that atheism is an alternate world view. i do not
include this for two reasons: 1) because it is
the obvious alternative to what is here 2)
i do not believe
there are any true "atheists" who do not hold something as
their god. usually the "all-knowing"
evolving god of science takes its place. but it could be
anything else.
|
Interesting look at Christian concepts embedded in the most ancient (and still in use) language on the planet. Dr. C. H. Kang finds roots of Biblical ideas in the very language of the Chinese. Fascinating read.